IT IS NOW EASIER TO ENTER THE US WITH EBOLA AND THE WHITE HOUSE WITH A KNIFE THAN TO VOTE IN WISCONSIN AND NORTH CAROLINA

by R J Shulman

WASHINGTON – (PTSD News Service) -  A new study conducted by the Pew Institute has revealed that it is more likely that a person will be allowed entry into the United States carrying the Ebola virus than to be allowed to vote in Wisconsin and North Carolina after those state’s new restrictive voter laws were validated by the United States Supreme Court.

“Our study shows that the type of voter identification now required by Wisconsin in addition to the new restrictions on early voting and various other provisions that limit people from voting makes it at least five times harder for a person to successfully vote in Wisconsin than for that same person to successfully jump a fence and enter the White House wielding a knife,” said Ryan Cornish, a Pew Institute researcher.  “If Eric Duncan, the man who brought Ebola from Liberia to Texas had used the same ID he used to get into the country to try and vote in North Carolina or Wisconsin, he would have been turned away,” Cornish said.

The study also noted that being able to vote in those states is now more difficult than buying an assault rifle, burning down an air traffic control center, breaking out of a maximum security prison, or surviving a conversation between Paris Hilton and Kim Kardashian as to which one of them deserves to be more famous.